The unfortunate truth is that discredited ideas never do die, they just rise again in slightly altered forms—witness eugenics. Despite the horrors perpetuated in its name, including forced sterilization and the Holocaust, the eugenic impulse is with us still. One of the forms it takes is schemes for “improving” offspring through the selection and manipulation of embryos.
In the last year or so, one neo-eugenic advocate in particular has been garnering media attention. He’s Julian Savulescu, holder of an array of titles, including an endowed chair and directorship of a center at the University of Oxford funded by the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education.
Savulescu also edits the Journal of Medical Ethics, which affords him significant influence in guiding academic discourse and research in the field. The theme of the journal’s February 2013 issue is “the biomedical enhancement of moral status,” a project that would surely count as eugenic in nature.
Writing about himself in third person in his online CV, Savulescu lays claim to the vanguard of neo-eugenics, proclaiming that
For the last 10 years, through a series of publications (4 monographs, 1 special journal issue, 29 book chapters, 45 articles), Savulescu has led the debate on the ethics of genetic selection and human enhancement.Not one to hide his light under a bushel, he goes on to tout his statistics: He grants top spot in his list of publications to a 2001 Bioethics article, “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children,” adding the gloss
27 articles responding to it, 14 exclusively. Landmark article arguing selection of children is not only permissible, but morally desirable. Introduced novel concept of Procreative Beneficence (cited by 137 – high citations are uncommon in the Humanities). 5th Highest Accessed Bioethics article 2010.Francis Galton would be proud.
Posted in A "Post-Human" Future?, Bioethics, Biopolitics, Parties & Pundits, Biotech & Pharma, Disability, Eugenics, Genetic Selection, Human Rights, Inheritable Genetic Modification, Reproductive Justice, Health & Rights, Synthetic Biology
CommentsAdd a Comment
Comment by MCITP Certification, May 19th, 2013 7:26pm
MCITP Training is often taken by people wishing to gain their certificate; some people study on their own with the help of DVD's and books while others join institutes. Regardless of the method chosen, a typical MCITP training course package should consist of video tutorials, virtual labs and practice exams which can be accessed through the Microsoft website.
Comment by Las Vegas Testosterone Replacement Therapy, Apr 3rd, 2013 4:10pm
This is a useful information that can help many people in understanding more about human bio technologies. I want to read more of your article.
Comment by rolex replica, Mar 5th, 2013 10:38pm
Important Source Of Why You Should Not Question The Effectiveness Of thank you for this post
Comment by Rian C. Banks, Mar 4th, 2013 4:56pm
I am also an advocate for Eugenics. I think families like the kalikaks prove that some people are irreversible incapable of turning away from what is in their genes and that no matter how nurture they receive they will never be able to change their ways or improve their status.